HENRIETTA MINING & MILLING CO. V. GARDNER, 173 U. S. 123 (1899)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 173 U. S. 123
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/173/123/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/173/123/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Henrietta Mining & Milling Co. v. Gardner, 173 U.S. 123 (1899)
Henrietta Mining and Milling Company v. Gardner
No. 140
Argued January 16, 1899
Decided February 20, 1899
173 U.S. 123
Syllabus
The provisions in the Revised Statutes of Arizona of 1887, c. 42, § 3, concerning the commencement of process for attachment, are inconsistent with those concerning the same subject contained in the Act of March 6, 1891, and although chapter 42 is not expressly repealed by the act of 1891, it must be held to be repealed by the later act on the principle laid
down in @ 78 U. S. 92, that
"when there are two acts on the same subject, the rule is to give effect to both if possible, but if the two are repugnant in any of their provisions, the latter act without any repealing clause operates, to the extent of the repugnancy, as a repeal of the first."
The case is stated in the opinion.