CHAPPELL CHEM. & FERT. CO. V. SULPHUR MINES CO. , 172 U. S. 472 (1899)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 172 U. S. 472
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/172/472/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/172/472/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Chappell Chem. & Fert. Co. v. Sulphur Mines Co. , 172 U.S. 472 (1899)
Chappell Chemical and Fertilizer Company
v. Sulphur Mines Company (No. 2)
No. 92
Argued December 16, 1898
Decided January 9, 1899
172 U.S. 472
Syllabus
The Court of Appeals of Maryland, in dismissing this case, said:
"The defendant, long after the time fixed by the rule of court, demanded a jury trial, and, without waiting for the action of the court upon his motion, and indeed before there was any trial of the case upon its merits and before any judgment, final or otherwise, was rendered, this appeal was taken from what the order of appeal calls the order of court of the 6th of February, 1896, denying the defendant the right of a jury trial; but no such order appears to have been passed. On the day mentioned in the order of appeal, there was an order passed by the court below fixing the case for trial, but there was no action taken in pursuance of such order until subsequent to this appeal. There is another appeal pending here from the orders which were ultimately passed."
Held that no federal question was disposed of by this decision.
This cause was argued with No. 91, the preceding case. The case is stated in the opinion.