FARMERS' LOAN & TRUST CO. V. CHICAGO &C. RY. CO., 163 U. S. 31 (1896)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 163 U. S. 31
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/163/31/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/163/31/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Chicago &c. Ry. Co., 163 U.S. 31 (1896)
Farmers' Loan and Trust Company v. Chicago,
Portage and Superior Railway Company
No. 60
Argued October 18, 21-22, 1896
Decided May 4, 1896
163 U.S. 31
Syllabus
The wrongs specifically charged in the bill in this case are those which were set forth in the suit of Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company, 151 U. S. 1, but there is this difference between the two cases -- that in that case, the Omaha Company demurred, and on the demurrer a decree was entered against it, whereas, in this case, the Omaha Company took issue upon the charge of having committed such wrongs, and the testimony shows that it did not commit them.
The act of the Legislature of Wisconsin of 1882, revoking the grant of land to the Portage Company and bestowing it upon the Omaha Company, neither in terms nor by implication burdened the transfer with a continuing obligation for the debts of the Portage Company, and no creditor of the Portage Company had any legal or equitable right to any portion of those lands.
The case is stated in the opinion.