BALTZER & TAAKS V. NORTH CAROLINA, 161 U. S. 246 (1896)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 161 U. S. 246
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/161/246/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/161/246/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Baltzer & Taaks v. North Carolina, 161 U.S. 246 (1896)
Baltzer and Taaks v. North Carolina
No. 52
Argued February 3-4, 1896
Decided March 2, 1896
161 U.S. 246
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Syllabus
Baltzer v. North Carolina, ante, 161 U. S. 240, followed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
The claim presented in this case to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina differs somewhat from that relied on in that court in the case of Baltzer v. North Carolina, No. 93 of the docket of this Court. The question of the power in the state court to give the relief prayed for was by it decided adversely to the plaintiff in error upon grounds identical with those considered by us in the case just decided. Our reasons for affirmance there expressed are conclusive of the issues here, and consequently the judgment is
Affirmed.