Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/156/207/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/156/207/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
In re Streep, 156 U.S. 207 (1895)
In re Streep
No number
Submitted January 21, 1895
Decided January 28, 1895
156 U.S. 207
ORIGINAL
Syllabus
The judge in a circuit court having settled and signed a bill of exceptions, this Court will not, on an application supported by affidavits that the bill as settled and signed is incorrect, issue a writ of mandamus requiring him to resettle them.
This was an application by Louis F. Streep for leave to file a petition for a mandamus requiring the judge of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New
York, acting as judge of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, to resettle the bill of exceptions in a certain cause lately pending in said circuit court, and tried before that judgment wherein the United States were plaintiffs and Louis F. Streep was defendant, as to a certain request to charge, "according to the truth as the same appears by the stenographer's minutes taken on the trial," in respect of which request to charge affidavits to the effect that the bill of exceptions as settled and signed by the judge was incorrect accompanied the application.
Applicant had previously moved in the circuit court for such resettlement of the bill of exceptions, and the motion had been denied.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, after making the above statement, said: the application for leave to file a petition for mandamus is denied. @ 29 U. S. 557.
