INGRAHAM V. UNITED STATES, 155 U. S. 434 (1894)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 155 U. S. 434
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/155/434/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/155/434/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Ingraham v. United States, 155 U.S. 434 (1894)
Ingraham v. United States
No. 379
Submitted October 23, 1894
Decided December 17, 1894
155 U.S. 434
Syllabus
Pointer v. United States, 151 U. S. 396, sustained and applied to the point that it is not error to join distinct offenses in one indictment, in separate counts, against the same person.
A person who presents to the Third Auditor of the Treasury what purports to be an affidavit before a justice of the peace in support of a fraudulent claim against the government is estopped to deny that the document was not an affidavit when presented in evidence in criminal proceedings against him for such fraudulent act.
It is not necessary in the first instance, in order to prove such offense, to produce the commission of the justice or to introduce other official evidence of his appointment.
The case is stated in the opinion.