COVINGTON & CINCINNATI ELEV. R. CO. V. KENTUCKY, 154 U. S. 224 (1894)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 154 U. S. 224
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/154/224/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/154/224/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Covington & Cincinnati Elev. R. Co. v. Kentucky, 154 U.S. 224 (1894)
Covington and Cincinnati Elevated Railroad
and Transfer and Bridge Co. v. Kentucky
No. 1043
Argued April 25, 1894
Decided May 26, 1894
154 U.S. 224
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
Syllabus
The judgment in this case is reversed on the authority of Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Kentucky, ante, 154 U. S. 204.
The case is stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE BROWN delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case differs from the last only in the fact that the plaintiff in error was not incorporated until 1886, and subsequently to a general law of the state declaring that all charters and grants of or to corporations shall be subject to amendment or repeal at the will of the legislature. Conceding that these words became a part of its charter, and hence that no contract was impaired by the legislation of 1890, such legislation is still open to the objection, found to exist in the former case, that it is in conflict with the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution.
The judgment of the court of appeals of Kentucky is therefore
Reversed, and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, MR. JUSTICE FIELD, MR. JUSTICE GRAY, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE concurred in the judgment of reversal, for the like reasons as in the case of Covington Bridge Co. v. Kentucky, ante, 154 U. S. 204, 154 U. S. 223.