NATIONAL METER CO. V. YONKERS WATER COMM'RS, 149 U. S. 48 (1893)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 149 U. S. 48
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/149/48/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/149/48/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
National Meter Co. v. Yonkers Water Comm'rs, 149 U.S. 48 (1893)
National Meter Company v. Yonkers Water Commissioners
No. 192
Argued March 29, 1893
Decided April 17, 1893
149 U.S. 48
Syllabus
Claims 3, 4, 5 and 6 of reissued letters patent No. 10,806, granted February 8, 1887, to the National Meter Company as assignee of Lewis Hallock Nash, for improvements in water meters, on the surrender of original letters patent No. 211,582, granted to said Nash, January 21, 1879, are not infringed by water meters constructed according to letters patent reissued to the Hersey Meter Company, No. 10,778, November 2, 1886, as assignees of James A. Tilden, and to letters patent No. 357, 159, granted to James A. Tilden, February 1, 1887, and to letters patent granted to said company, as assignee of said Tilden, No. 385,910, July 10, 1888.
The Nash piston has a side-rocking movement across the center of the cylinder, upon successive bearing points made by the contact of a projection on the piston with the recess in the cylinder, or conversely, and the piston rotates upon its own axis, so that each projection comes successively into each recess of the cylinder. But in the defendant's structure, there is no side-rocking, nor any rotary motion, and each projection in the piston always operates in connection with one particular corresponding recess in the cylinder, and never leaves that recess.
In equity. The case is stated in the opinion.