Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/148/196/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/148/196/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Truesdell, 148 U.S. 196 (1893)
United States v. Truesdell
No. 552
Submitted January 9, 1893
Decided March 6, 1893
148 U.S. 196
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
This case is affirmed on the authority of United States v. Alexander, ante, 148 U. S. 186.
The case is stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS delivered the opinion of the Court.
This suit was brought in the Court of Claims to recover damages for the loss of a well occasioned by the construction of an extension of the Washington aqueduct, and for compensation for a right of way across land of the complainant taken for the purpose of constructing a tunnel, by virtue of an Act of Congress of July 15, 1882, entitled "An act to increase the water supply of the City of Washington, and for other purposes." 22 Stat. 168.
So far as the recovery of the plaintiff below was based on the claim for compensation for land actually taken, the United States do not, in this appeal, complain. But they contend that the injury caused by the destruction of the well was damnum absque injuria. The liability of the United States, under the statute, by virtue of which the work in question was done and the damages occasioned, has been declared in the opinion of this Court in the case, just decided, of United States v. Alexander, ante, 148 U. S. 186, where the facts were similar, and we do not need to repeat what is therein said.
The judgment of the court below is accordingly
Affirmed.
