LA CONFIANCE COMPAGNIE ANONYME D'ASSURANCE V. HALL, 137 U. S. 61 (1890)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 137 U. S. 61
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/137/61/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/137/61/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
La Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance v. Hall, 137 U.S. 61 (1890)
La Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance v. Hall
No. 11
Argued and submitted October 21, 1890
Decided November 3, 1890
137 U.S. 61
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Syllabus
In a petition for the removal of a cause from a state court on the ground of diverse citizenship, the failure to state the existence of such citizenship at the commencement of the suit as well as when the removal was asked is a fatal defect.
The case is stated in the opinion.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the Court.
This action was commenced by plaintiff in error in a state court, and removed to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri upon petition of the defendant on the ground that the plaintiff was an alien and citizen of France, and the defendant a citizen of Missouri. The existence of such diverse citizenship at the commencement of the suit, as well as when the removal was asked, did not appear affirmatively in the petition for removal or in the record when that was filed. We are compelled to reverse the judgment, with costs, and remit the cause to the circuit court with a direction to remand to the state court. Stevens v. Nichols, 130 U. S. 230; Crehore v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co., 131 U. S. 240; Jackson v. Allen, 132 U. S. 27.
Ordered accordingly.