Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/134/624/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/134/624/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Lacher, 134 U.S. 624 (1890)
United States v. Lacher
No. 654
Submitted March 28, 1890
Decided April 14, 1890
134 U.S. 624
Syllabus
Section 5467 of the Revised Statutes creates two distinct classes of offenses: the one relating to the embezzlement of letters, etc.; the other relating to stealing their contents.
Sections 3591 and 5467 of the Revised Statutes are to be construed together -- the offenses of secreting, embezzling or destroying mail matter which contains articles of value being punishable under the one, and like offenses as to mail matter which does not contain such articles being punishable under the other.
When there is an ambiguity in a section of the Revised Statutes, resort may be had to the original statute from which the section was taken, to ascertain what, if any, change of phraseology there is, and whether such change should be construed as changing the law.
Penal statutes, like all others, are to be fairly construed according to the legislative intent, as expressed in the act.
The Court again declines to answer a certified question which contains no clear and distinct proposition of law.
The case is stated in the opinion.
