Huidekoper v. Locomotive Works
99 U.S. 258

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Huidekoper v. Locomotive Works, 99 U.S. 258 (1878)

Huidekoper v. Locomotive Works

99 U.S. 258

Syllabus

The ruling in Fosdick v. Schall, supra, p. 235, that the funds in the hands of a receiver of a railroad appointed in a suit to foreclose a mortgage executed by the company must be applied to the satisfaction of the lien of the mortgage creditors and not to the payment of debts due to the general creditors of the company, reaffirmed and applied to this case.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.