Atwood v. Weems
99 U.S. 183 (1878)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Atwood v. Weems, 99 U.S. 183 (1878)

Atwood v. Weems

99 U.S. 183

Syllabus

1. The right, under sec. 821 of the Revised Statutes, to require the panel of the jurors called to serve for a term to take the oath therein prescribed, or to be discharged from the panel, is limited to the district attorney, and is not a right of individual suitors in a case about to be tried.

2. A testator in whom was the legal title to lands, which he had sold by a written contract, can transfer by his will both such title and the notes given for the purchase of them, and the devisee will stand towards the purchaser in the same position that the testator did.

3. The court reaffirms the ruling in Bennett v. Hunter, 9 Wall. 326, and Tacey v. Irwin, 18 Wall. 549, that a sale for direct taxes under the act of 1862 is void where, before the sale, the owner or someone for him was ready and offered to pay them, and was told that payment would not be accepted.

4. Such offer to pay, made to a clerk of the board of commissioners at their office, who was authorized by them to receive delinquent taxes generally, is sufficient.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Page 99 U. S. 184

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.