Ex Parte Parks
93 U.S. 18 (1876)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Ex Parte Parks, 93 U.S. 18 (1876)

Ex Parte Parks

93 U.S. 18

Syllabus

1. Where an inferior court has jurisdiction of the cause and the person in a criminal suit, and no writ of error lies from this Court, it will not on habeas corpus review the legality of the proceedings.

2. It is only where the proceedings below are entirely void, either for want of jurisdiction, or other cause, that such relief will be given.

3. Whether a matter for which a party is indicted in the district court is or is not a crime against the laws of the United States is a question within the jurisdiction of that court, which it must decide. Its decision will not be reviewed here by habeas corpus.

4. Ex pane Yerger, 8 Wall. 85, and Ex Parte Lange, 18 Wall. 163, referred to and approved.

The petition is set forth, and the facts in the case are stated, in the opinion of the Court.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.