Ex Parte Dugan - 69 U.S. 134 (1864)


U.S. Supreme Court

Ex Parte Dugan, 69 U.S. 2 Wall. 134 134 (1864)

Ex Parte Dugan

69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 134

Syllabus

On a mere petition for a certiorari, the court, according to its better and more regular practice, will decline to hear the case on its merits even though the counsel for the petitioner produce a copy of the record admitted on the other side to be a true one. It will wait for a return, in form, from the court below.

On a petition for a certiorari to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia to send up the record of their proceedings upon a habeas corpus issued from that court upon the application of the petitioner, it was stated by Mr. J. H. Bradley, counsel of the petitioner, that a copy of the record had been obtained, and he asked this Court, upon the admission of the Attorney General that the copy was a correct one, to hear the case without a return from the court below. The Attorney General, on the other hand, while admitting the copy of the record produced to be correct, moved the Court, for reasons which he laid, to continue the case.



Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.