United States v. City Bank of Columbus
62 U.S. 356 (1858)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. City Bank of Columbus, 62 U.S. 21 How. 356 356 (1858)

United States v. City Bank of Columbus

62 U.S. (21 How.) 356

Syllabus

Where the cashier of a bank wrote to the Secretary of the Treasury, saying that the bearer of the letter was authorized to contract for the transfer of money from New York to New Orleans, and such a transaction was not within the scope of the powers of the cashier nor authorized by the directors, the bank was not bound to reimburse the money which the Secretary of the Treasury advanced.

The facts of this case and also the instructions given to the jury upon the trial are all set forth in the opinion of the Court.

Page 62 U. S. 360

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.