HOGAN v. ROSS
50 U.S. 602

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

HOGAN v. ROSS, 50 U.S. 602 (1850)

50 U.S. 602 (How.)

SMITH HOGAN, ARTHUR S. HOGAN, AND RICHARD Y. REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
AARON ROSS, WHO SUES FOR THE USE OF ROBERT PATTERSON.

January Term, 1850

THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi.

Page 50 U.S. 602, 603

The order of the court explains the ground of its dismissal, upon the motion of Mr. Coxe.

Order.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, and on the motion of Richard S. Coxe, Esquire, of counsel for the defendant in error, stating that no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.


Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.