Hanrahan v. Hampton
446 U.S. 1301 (1980)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Hanrahan v. Hampton, 446 U.S. 1301 (1980)

Hanrahan v. Hampton

No. 79-912

Decided April 30, 1980*

446 U.S. 1301

ON MOTION TO RECUSE

Motion to recuse MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST is denied.

MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST.

Plaintiffs-respondents and their counsel in these cases have moved that I "be recused from the proceedings in this case" for the reasons stated in their 14-page motion and their five Appendices filed with the Clerk of this Court on April 3, 1980. The motion is opposed by the state-defendant petitioners in the action. Since generally the Court as an institution leaves such motions, even though they be addressed to it, to the decision of the individual Justices to whom they refer, see Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. Mine Workers,325 U. S. 897 (1945) (denial of petition for rehearing) (Jackson, J., concurring), I shall treat the motion as addressed to me individually. I have considered the motion, the Appendices, the response of the state defendants, 28 U.S.C. § 455 (1976 ed. and Supp. III), and the current American Bar Association Code of Judicial Conduct, and the motion is accordingly

Denied.

* Together with No. 79-914, Johnson et al. v. Hampton et al.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.