BLAKLEY v. FLORIDA
444 U.S. 904 (1979)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

BLAKLEY v. FLORIDA , 444 U.S. 904 (1979)

444 U.S. 904

Freddy Duane BLAKLEY
v.
State of FLORIDA
No. 78-1749

Supreme Court of the United States

October 9, 1979

On petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice WHITE, with whom Mr. Justice BRENNAN joins, dissenting.

I dissent from the denial of certiorari. In Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 619 (1976), the Court held "that the use for impeachment purposes of petitioners' silence, at the time of arrest and after receiving Miranda warnings violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."

Page 444 U.S. 904 , 905

The petitioner in this case was tried and convicted for the crime of sexual battery involving the use of great force. On direct examination in the State's case in chief a police officer testified that petitioner refused to make a statement after he was arrested and given Miranda warnings. Defense objections to this testimony were overruled by the trial court. On appeal, petitioner's conviction was affirmed by a divided Florida District Court of Appeal. 362 So.2d 309 (1978).

I would grant certiorari in this case because the decision of the Florida District Court of Appeal is in conflict with Doyle v. Ohio, supra. Indeed, the conflict with Doyle seems sufficiently clear to me to warrant summary reversal of petitioner's conviction.


Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.