Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co., Inc.
429 U.S. 648 (1977)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co., Inc., 429 U.S. 648 (1977)

Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co., Inc.

No. 76-613

Decided February 22, 1977

429 U.S. 648

Syllabus

A plaintiff in federal court, whether prosecuting a state or federal cause of action, may not appeal from a remittitur order he has accepted. Hence, where petitioner seaman in his action under the Jones Act for injuries sustained on board ship accepted "under protest" a reduced verdict when the District Court ordered a new trial on damages unless petitioner agreed to a remittitur, the Court of Appeal properly dismissed petitioner's appeal from such order on the ground that a plaintiff cannot "protest" a remittitur he has accepted in an attempt to open it to challenge on appeal.

Certiorari granted; 536 F.2d 536, affirmed.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.