Idaho ex rel. Andrus v. Oregon
429 U.S. 163 (1976)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Idaho ex rel. Andrus v. Oregon, 429 U.S. 163 (1976)

Idaho ex rel. Andrus v. Oregon

No. 67, Orig.

Argued November 8, 1976

Decided December 7, 1976

429 U.S. 163

Syllabus

Without determining whether the bill of complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted, Idaho's motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is granted to the extent that the complaint prays that the Court declare Idaho entitled as against Oregon and Washington to an equitable portion of the upriver anadromous fishery of the Columbia River Basin and that the Court determine such portion on the evidence and award costs and incidental relief, but is denied in all other respects.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.