Weinstein v. Bradford
423 U.S. 147 (1975)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147 (1975)

Weinstein v. Bradford

No. 74-1287

Decided December 10, 1975

423 U.S. 147

Syllabus

Where respondent was paroled after the Court of Appeals upheld his claim in his action against petitioner parole board members that he was constitutionally entitled to certain procedural rights in connection with petitioners' consideration of his eligibility for parole, the case is moot, and does not present an issue "capable of repetition, yet evading review," since the action is not a class action and there is no demonstrated probability that respondent will again be subjected to the parole system. Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle,416 U. S. 115, distinguished.

519 F.2d 728, vacated and remanded.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.