Brunette Machine Works v. Kockum Indus.Annotate this Case
406 U.S. 706 (1972)
U.S. Supreme Court
Brunette Machine Works v. Kockum Indus., 406 U.S. 706 (1972)
Brunette Machine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.
Argued March 23, 1972
Decided June 7, 1972
406 U.S. 706
Title 28 U.S.C. § 1391(d), providing that "[a]n alien may be sued in any district," embodies the long-established rule that a suit against an alien is wholly outside the operation of all federal venue laws (whether general or special), and governs the venue of an action for patent infringement against an alien. The District Court therefore erred in holding that § 1400(b) (which provides that a patent infringement suit may be brought in the district of the defendant's residence, or where he has committed infringement acts and has a regular place of business) is the exclusive provision governing venue in patent infringement litigation. Pp. 406 U. S. 708-714.
442 F.2d 420, affirmed.
MARSHALL, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.