Dukes v. Warden
406 U.S. 250 (1972)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Dukes v. Warden, 406 U.S. 250 (1972)

Dukes v. Warden

No. 71-5172

Argued March 21, 1972

Decided May 15, 1972

406 U.S. 250

Syllabus

Petitioner's claim that his guilty plea was not voluntarily and intelligently made because of an alleged conflict of interest on the part of his counsel has no merit, and that alleged conflict of interest is therefore not a reason for vacating his plea. Pp. 406 U. S. 251-257.

161 Conn. 337, 288 A.2d.58, affirmed.

BRENNAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and STEWART, WHITE, BLACKMUN, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. STEWART, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 406 U. S. 257. MARSHALL, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which DOUGLAS, J., joined, post, p. 406 U. S. 259.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.