NEW YORK v. CONNECTICUT
4 U.S. 6 (1799)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

NEW YORK v. CONNECTICUT, 4 U.S. 6 (1799)

4 U.S. 6 (Dall.)

The State of New York
v.
The State of Connecticut et al. *

August Term, 1799

AS the state of Connecticut did not appear, Hoffman moved that she should appear on the first day of next term, or that the plaintiff be then at liberty to proceed ex parte. 3 Dal. 335. But Lewis observed, that the rule required that a subpoena issuing in a suit in equity, should be served sixty days before the return; which had not been done in the present case. The first motion was, thereupon, waived; and an alias subpoena awarded. 3 Dall. 320.

Footnotes

[Footnote *] See same cause at 4 U.S. 1, 4 Dall. 1.[ New York v. Connecticut

Footnote 4 U.S. 6 (1799) ]




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.