Daniel v. Goliday
398 U.S. 73 (1970)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Daniel v. Goliday, 398 U.S. 73 (1970)

Daniel v. Goliday

No. 1211

Decided May 25, 1970

398 U.S. 73

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Syllabus

District Court should consider bearing of Goldberg v. Kelly,397 U. S. 254, and Wheeler v. Montgomery,397 U. S. 280, on question of entitlement of welfare recipients to notice and hearing before reduction of benefits.

305 F.Supp. 1224, vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The court below has held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires a State to provide a recipient of public welfare benefits with notice and a hearing prior to "termination, suspension, or reduction" of benefits. This Court's subsequent decisions in Goldberg v. Kelly,397 U. S. 254, and Wheeler v. Montgomery,397 U. S. 280, decided March 23, 1970, dealt only with termination and suspension, not reduction, of benefits. We think that the bearing of those decisions on the treatment of benefit reductions should be determined in the first instance by the District Court on a record developed by the parties with specific attention to that issue. Accordingly, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent.

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.