FOLLETTE v. COMACHO
398 U.S. 279 (1970)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

FOLLETTE v. COMACHO, 398 U.S. 279 (1970)

398 U.S. 279

FOLLETTE, WARDEN v. COMACHO
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT No. 1394.
Decided June 1, 1970

Certiorari granted; 421 F.2d 822, vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/398/279/case.html">398 U.S. 279</a> (1970) 398 U.S. 279 (1970) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES, 398 U.S. 279 (1970)

398 U.S. 279

HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT No. 1183, Misc.
Decided June 1, 1970

Certiorari granted; 416 F.2d 406, vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 398 U.S. 279, 280

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.