JACKSON v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA, 397 U.S. 589 (1970)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
JACKSON v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA, 397 U.S. 589 (1970) 397 U.S. 589JACKSON ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WELFARE OF FLORIDA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA No. 471, Misc.
Decided April 20, 1970
Vacated and remanded.
Howard W. Dixon for appellants.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, T. T. Turnbull and Michael Schwartz, Assistant Attorneys General, and S. Strome Maxwell for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in light of Goldberg v. Kelly, ante, p. 254; Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23; and to determine whether the case is moot.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA No. 471, Misc.
Decided April 20, 1970
Vacated and remanded. Howard W. Dixon for appellants. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, T. T. Turnbull and Michael Schwartz, Assistant Attorneys General, and S. Strome Maxwell for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in light of Goldberg v. Kelly, ante, p. 254; Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23; and to determine whether the case is moot. THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent. Page 397 U.S. 589, 590
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
JACKSON v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA, 397 U.S. 589 (1970) 397 U.S. 589 (1970) 397 U.S. 589 397 U.S. 589"> JACKSON ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF FLORIDA ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA No. 471, Misc.
Decided April 20, 1970
Vacated and remanded. Howard W. Dixon for appellants. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, T. T. Turnbull and Michael Schwartz, Assistant Attorneys General, and S. Strome Maxwell for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in light of Goldberg v. Kelly, ante, p. 254; Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23; and to determine whether the case is moot. THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent. Page 397 U.S. 589, 590
Search This Case
