CITY OF NEW YORK v. UNITED STATESAnnotate this Case
397 U.S. 248 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 248 (1970)397 U.S. 248
CITY OF NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. 1121.
Decided March 16, 1970*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 1122, Grossman et al. v. Automobile Manufacturers Assn., Inc., et al., also on appeal from the same court.
307 F. Supp. 617, affirmed in No. 1121, appeal dismissed in No. 1122.
J. Lee Rankin, Norman Redlich, John R. Thompson, and David I. Shapiro for appellant in No. 1121. Benjamin F. Schwartz and Herbert A. Karzen for appellants in No. 1122.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, and Bernard M. Hollander for the United States in both cases. Carl J. Schuck, Wayne H. Knight, Fred D. Fagg III, Philip K. Verleger, Allyn O. Kreps, Julian O. Von Kalinowski, Lloyd N. Cutler, Howard P. Willens, James S. Campbell, Ross L. Malone, and Marcus Mattson for Automobile Manufacturers Assn., Inc., et al., appellees in both cases.
Briefs of amici curiae in No. 1121 were filed by Jerry S. Cohen, Harold E. Kohn, Aaron M. Fine, and William T. Coleman, Jr., for the City of Baltimore et al.; by John H. Larson for the County of Los Angeles et al.; and by David Berger and Herbert B. Newberg for the County of Lackawanna et al.
In No. 1121 the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
In No. 1122 the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.