IN RE REED
396 U.S. 274 (1970)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

IN RE REED, 396 U.S. 274 (1970)

396 U.S. 274

IN RE REED
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE
No. 706.
Decided January 12, 1970

___ Del. ___, 257 A. 2d 382, appeal dismissed.

Warren B. Burt for appellant.

David P. Buckson, Attorney General, and Ruth M. Ferrell, State Solicitor, for the State of Delaware.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/274/case.html">396 U.S. 274</a> (1970) 396 U.S. 274 (1970) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, 396 U.S. 274 (1970)

396 U.S. 274

LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 715.
Decided January 12, 1970

271 Cal. App. 2d 774, 76 Cal. Rptr. 869, appeal dismissed.

Randal F. Dickey, Jr., and Robert L. McCarty for appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Harold B. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, and William J. Power, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 396 U.S. 274, 275




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.