BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES
396 U.S. 27 (1969)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 27 (1969)

396 U.S. 27

BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS No. 343.
Decided November 10, 1969*

No. 343, 297 F. Supp. 615; Nos. 480 and 497, 300 F. Supp. 318, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 480, Arizona Corporation Commission et al. v. United States et al., and No. 497, Union Pacific Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Carl E. Newton and M. Lauck Walton for appellants in No. 343. Lee Johnson, Attorney General of Oregon, Richard W. Sabin, Assistant Attorney General, and Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, for appellants in No. 480. Howard J. Trienens, Martin M. Lucente, George L. Saunders, Jr., R. Ames, W. W. Dalton, K. A. Dobbins, J. H. Durkin, N. Melvin, T. A. Miller, A. B. Russ, Jr., R. D. Sickler, E. L. Van Dellen, R. W. Yost, and S. R. Brittingham, Jr., for appellants in No. 497.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Fritz R. Kahn, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al. in all cases. Hugh B. Cox and William H. Allen for railroad appellees in all cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.

Page 396 U.S. 27, 28




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.