AMBROSE v. WELLS
396 U.S. 112 (1969)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

AMBROSE v. WELLS, 396 U.S. 112 (1969)

396 U.S. 112

AMBROSE ET AL. v. WELLS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK No. 580.
Decided December 8, 1969

Appeal dismissed.

John M. Armentano for appellants.

Robert B. McKay for Wells, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, for Rockefeller et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


GOODING v. WILSON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/396/112/case.html">396 U.S. 112</a> (1969) 396 U.S. 112 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GOODING v. WILSON, 396 U.S. 112 (1969)

396 U.S. 112

GOODING, WARDEN v. WILSON
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA No. 582.
Decided December 8, 1969

303 F. Supp. 952, appeal dismissed.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion O. Gordon and Courtney Wilder Stanton, Assistant Attorneys General, and Franklin Pierce for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Page 396 U.S. 112, 113




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.