PRONER v. UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 823 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
PRONER v. UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 823 (1969) 395 U.S. 823PRONER v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1022.
Decided June 23, 1969.
Certiorari granted; 405 F.2d 943, vacated and remanded.
Harris B. Steinberg for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Benton v. Maryland, ante, p. 784.
395 U.S. 823 (1969) 395 U.S. 823 (1969) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ANDERSON v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DLMT. AGENCY, 395 U.S. 823 (1969) 395 U.S. 823ANDERSON ET AL. v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF
PADUCAH, KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY. No. 1414.
Decided June 23, 1969.
436 S.W.2d 533, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Michael Avedisian for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
PRONER v. UNITED STATES, 395 U.S. 823 (1969) 395 U.S. 823 PRONER v. UNITED STATES.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1022.
Decided June 23, 1969.
Certiorari granted; 405 F.2d 943, vacated and remanded. Harris B. Steinberg for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Joseph M. Howard for the United States. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Benton v. Maryland, ante, p. 784.
395 U.S. 823 (1969) 395 U.S. 823 (1969) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ANDERSON v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DLMT. AGENCY, 395 U.S. 823 (1969) 395 U.S. 823 ANDERSON ET AL. v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OFPADUCAH, KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY. No. 1414.
Decided June 23, 1969.
436 S.W.2d 533, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Michael Avedisian for appellants. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 395 U.S. 823, 824
