SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA
394 U.S. 845 (1969)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 845 (1969)

394 U.S. 845

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1050.
Decided May 5, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

Robert L. Pierce for appellant.

Mary Moran Pajalich for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/394/845/case.html">394 U.S. 845</a> (1969) 394 U.S. 845 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 845 (1969)

394 U.S. 845

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1152.
Decided May 5, 1969.

Affirmed.

Robert L. Pierce for appellant.

Mary Moran Pajalich for appellee Public Utilities Commission of California.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 394 U.S. 845, 846

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.