Norfolk Monument Co. v. Woodlawn Mem. Gardens
394 U.S. 700 (1969)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Norfolk Monument Co. v. Woodlawn Mem. Gardens, 394 U.S. 700 (1969)

Norfolk Monument Co., Inc. v. Woodlawn Memorial Gardens, Inc.

No. 1040

Decided April 21, 1969

394 U.S. 700

Syllabus

Petitioner, a retailer of burial monuments and bronze grave markers, brought suit for damages and injunctive relief under §§ 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, alleging that respondents had violated §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act by conspiring to monopolize and monopolizing the manufacture and sale of bronze grave markers. After extensive pretrial discovery respondents' motion for summary judgment was granted, the District Court concluding that there was no material issue of fact and no evidence of conspiracy. T he Court of Appeals affirmed.

Held: The alleged conspiracy had not been conclusively disproved by pretrial discovery, and there remained material issues of fact which could only be resolved by a jury after a plenary trial. "[S]ummary procedures should be used sparingly in complex antitrust litigation where motive and intent play leading roles. . . ." Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System,368 U. S. 464, 368 U. S. 473.

Certiorari granted; 404 F.2d 1008, reversed.

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.