MITCHELL v. RIDDELL
394 U.S. 456 (1969)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

MITCHELL v. RIDDELL, 394 U.S. 456 (1969)

394 U.S. 456

MITCHELL ET AL. v. RIDDELL, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 1044.
Decided April 1, 1969.

402 F.2d 842, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Gilbert E. Andrews for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


MacQUARRIE v. McLAUGHLIN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/394/456/case.html">394 U.S. 456</a> (1969) 394 U.S. 456 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MacQUARRIE v. McLAUGHLIN, 394 U.S. 456 (1969)

394 U.S. 456

MacQUARRIE v. McLAUGHLIN, REGISTRAR OF MOTOR VEHICLES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 1483, Misc.
Decided April 1, 1969.

294 F. Supp. 176, affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 394 U.S. 456, 457

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.