IN RE GROSS
394 U.S. 321 (1969)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

IN RE GROSS, 394 U.S. 321 (1969)

394 U.S. 321

IN RE GROSS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1035.
Decided March 24, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

Burton Marks for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey, and Michael T. Sauer for the State of California.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


FEDERAL-BRYANT MACH. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE/ILLINOIS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/394/321/case.html">394 U.S. 321</a> (1969) 394 U.S. 321 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

FEDERAL-BRYANT MACH. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE/ILLINOIS, 394 U.S. 321 (1969)

394 U.S. 321

FEDERAL-BRYANT MACHINERY CO. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1069.
Decided March 24, 1969.

41 Ill. 2d 64, 241 N. E. 2d 857, appeal dismissed.

Harry H. Ruskin for appellant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, and Francis T. Crowe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 394 U.S. 321, 322

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.