SHAW v. ILLINOIS
394 U.S. 214 (1969)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

SHAW v. ILLINOIS, 394 U.S. 214 (1969)

394 U.S. 214

SHAW v. ILLINOIS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE
COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT. No. 665, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 89 Ill. App. 2d 285, 233 N. E. 2d 73, vacated and remanded.

Gerald W. Getty and Marshall J. Hartman for petitioner.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, for further consideration in light of Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.


WATTS v. MARYLAND, <a href="/cases/federal/us/394/214/case.html">394 U.S. 214</a> (1969) 394 U.S. 214 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WATTS v. MARYLAND, 394 U.S. 214 (1969)

394 U.S. 214

WATTS v. MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 1267, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 394 U.S. 214, 215

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.