DUNBAR-STANLEY STUDIOS, INC. v. CITY OF MOBILE, 394 U.S. 212 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court
DUNBAR-STANLEY STUDIOS, INC. v. CITY OF MOBILE, 394 U.S. 212 (1969) 394 U.S. 212DUNBAR-STANLEY STUDIOS, INC. v. CITY OF
MOBILE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 377.
Decided March 10, 1969.
282 Ala. 386, 211 So. 2d 803, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
J. Edward Thornton and Glen B. Hardymon for appellant.
Barry Hess for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
394 U.S. 212 (1969) 394 U.S. 212 (1969) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
POWERS v. PERRY CIRCUIT COURT, 394 U.S. 212 (1969) 394 U.S. 212POWERS ET AL. v. PERRY CIRCUIT COURT ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
INDIANA.
No. 559, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Richard V. Bennett, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374.
U.S. Supreme Court
DUNBAR-STANLEY STUDIOS, INC. v. CITY OF MOBILE, 394 U.S. 212 (1969) 394 U.S. 212 DUNBAR-STANLEY STUDIOS, INC. v. CITY OF MOBILE.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 377.
Decided March 10, 1969.
282 Ala. 386, 211 So. 2d 803, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. J. Edward Thornton and Glen B. Hardymon for appellant. Barry Hess for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
394 U.S. 212 (1969) 394 U.S. 212 (1969) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
POWERS v. PERRY CIRCUIT COURT, 394 U.S. 212 (1969) 394 U.S. 212 POWERS ET AL. v. PERRY CIRCUIT COURT ET AL.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 559, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Richard V. Bennett, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374. Page 394 U.S. 212, 213
