WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. SUMMERFORD
393 U.S. 9 (1968)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. SUMMERFORD, 393 U.S. 9 (1968)

393 U.S. 9

WHITNEY STORES, INC., ET AL. v. SUMMERFORD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 85.
Decided October 14, 1968.

280 F. Supp. 406, affirmed.

E. N. Zeigler for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.


HORNBEAK v. HAMM, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/9/case.html">393 U.S. 9</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 9 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HORNBEAK v. HAMM, 393 U.S. 9 (1968)

393 U.S. 9

HORNBEAK v. HAMM, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FOR ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT
OF ALABAMA. No. 260.
Decided October 14, 1968.

283 F. Supp. 549, affirmed.

Barry Hess for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston and Herbert I. Burson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWARD are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument.

Page 393 U.S. 9, 10

Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.