SUTTON v. ADAMS
393 U.S. 404 (1969)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

SUTTON v. ADAMS, 393 U.S. 404 (1969)

393 U.S. 404

SUTTON v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 726.
Decided January 20, 1969.

212 So.2d 1, appeal dismissed.

Milton E. Grusmark for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, pro se, and Robert A. Chastain and Wilson W. Wright, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.


BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/404/case.html">393 U.S. 404</a> (1969) 393 U.S. 404 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, 393 U.S. 404 (1969)

393 U.S. 404

BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 852.
Decided January 20, 1969.

292 F. Supp. 851, affirmed.

Jerome M. Kay for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 393 U.S. 404, 405

Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.