FREED v. BALDI
393 U.S. 317 (1969)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

FREED v. BALDI, 393 U.S. 317 (1969)

393 U.S. 317

FREED v. BALDI ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 652.
Decided January 13, 1969.

___ Colo. ___, 443 P.2d 716, appeal dismissed.

George Louis Creamer for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BENNETT v. COTTINGHAM, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/317/case.html">393 U.S. 317</a> (1969) 393 U.S. 317 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BENNETT v. COTTINGHAM, 393 U.S. 317 (1969)

393 U.S. 317

BENNETT ET AL. v. COTTINGHAM ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 665.
Decided January 13, 1969.

290 F. Supp. 759, affirmed.

Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, Melvyn Zarr, Oscar W. Adams, Jr., and Anthony G. Amsterdam for appellants.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, pro se, and Robert P. Bradley, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 317, 318




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.