HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRIERS' BUREAU v. UNITED STATES
393 U.S. 265 (1968)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRIERS' BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 265 (1968)

393 U.S. 265

HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRIERS' BUREAU ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 615.
Decided December 16, 1968.

288 F. Supp. 641, affirmed.

Homer S. Carpenter for appellants.

Alan F. Wohlstetter for Household Goods Forwarders Association of America, Inc., et al., intervening defendants below.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Robert W. Ginnane, and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


OGLE v. HEIM, <a href="/cases/federal/us/393/265/case.html">393 U.S. 265</a> (1968) 393 U.S. 265 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

OGLE v. HEIM, 393 U.S. 265 (1968)

393 U.S. 265

OGLE v. HEIM, AUDITOR-CONTROLLER OF COUNTY OF ORANGE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 617.
Decided December 16, 1968.

69 Cal. 2d 7, 442 P.2d 659, appeal dismissed.

Eric A. Rose for appellant.

Robert F. Nuttman for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 393 U.S. 265, 266




Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.