GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK
392 U.S. 643 (1968)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968)

392 U.S. 643

GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1261.
Decided June 17, 1968.

21 N. Y. 2d 152, 234 N. E. 2d 194, appeal dismissed.

Robert E. Goldman and Stephen R. Wiener for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.


RHODES v. COOK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/392/643/case.html">392 U.S. 643</a> (1968) 392 U.S. 643 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

RHODES v. COOK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968)

392 U.S. 643

RHODES v. COOK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1283.
Decided June 17, 1968.

72 Wash. 2d 436, 433 P.2d 677, appeal dismissed.

E. A. Niemeier, Frank A. Bauman, John K. Mallory, Jr., and R. Michael Duncan for appellant.

John F. Wilson for appellee.

Harry R. Calbom, Jr., for Pay'n Pak Stores, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

Page 392 U.S. 643, 644




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.