SERIO v. UNITED STATESAnnotate this Case
392 U.S. 305 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
SERIO v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 305 (1968)392 U.S. 305
SERIO v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 200, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 126 U.S. App. D.C. 297, 377 F.2d 936, vacated and remanded.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Paul C. Summitt for the United States.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.