VAUGHN v. RODRIGUEZ
391 U.S. 603 (1968)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

VAUGHN v. RODRIGUEZ, 391 U.S. 603 (1968)

391 U.S. 603

VAUGHN v. RODRIGUEZ, ACTING WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1149, Misc.
Decided June 3, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Boston E. Witt, Attorney General of New Mexico, and Thomas O. Olson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Peyton v. Rowe, ante, p. 54.


PEART v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/391/603/case.html">391 U.S. 603</a> (1968) 391 U.S. 603 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PEART v. CALIFORNIA, 391 U.S. 603 (1968)

391 U.S. 603

PEART v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1445, Misc.
Decided June 3, 1968.

67 Cal. 2d 866, 434 P.2d 609, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 391 U.S. 603, 604




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.