BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO. v. STANDARD OIL CO., 391 U.S. 366 (1968)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO. v. STANDARD OIL CO., 391 U.S. 366 (1968) 391 U.S. 366

BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO. ET AL. v. STANDARD OIL CO. OF TEXAS ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 503.
Decided May 20, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 376 F.2d 578, reversed.

Edwin F. Russell and Barbara M. Suchow for Brooklyn Union Gas Co., Bertram D. Moll and Morton L. Simons for Long Island Lighting Co., and Kent H. Brown for Public Service Commission of the State of New York, petitioners.

Martin N. Erck and Frank S. Troidl for respondent Humble Oil & Refining Co.; Thomas G. Crouch, Robert W. Henderson, and Donald K. Young for respondent Hunt; Sherman S. Poland for respondent Coates; Robert V. Smith for respondent Patchin-Wilmoth Industries, Inc.; J. Evans Attwell and W. H. Drushel, Jr., for respondent Clark Fuel Producing Co.; William K. Tell, Jr., William R. Slye, and James D. Annett for respondent Texaco Inc.; Phillip D. Endom, Robert E. May, and Francis H. Caskin for respondent Sun Oil Co.; Homer E. McEwen, Jr., for respondent Sunray DX Oil Co.; Richard F. Remmers for respondent Sohio Petroleum Co.; and Kiel Boone for respondent Cox.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Federal Power Commission v. Sunray DX Oil Co., ante, p. 9.


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO. v. STANDARD OIL CO., 391 U.S. 366 (1968) 391 U.S. 366 BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO. ET AL. v. STANDARD OIL CO. OF TEXAS ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 503.
Decided May 20, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 376 F.2d 578, reversed.

Edwin F. Russell and Barbara M. Suchow for Brooklyn Union Gas Co., Bertram D. Moll and Morton L. Simons for Long Island Lighting Co., and Kent H. Brown for Public Service Commission of the State of New York, petitioners.

Martin N. Erck and Frank S. Troidl for respondent Humble Oil & Refining Co.; Thomas G. Crouch, Robert W. Henderson, and Donald K. Young for respondent Hunt; Sherman S. Poland for respondent Coates; Robert V. Smith for respondent Patchin-Wilmoth Industries, Inc.; J. Evans Attwell and W. H. Drushel, Jr., for respondent Clark Fuel Producing Co.; William K. Tell, Jr., William R. Slye, and James D. Annett for respondent Texaco Inc.; Phillip D. Endom, Robert E. May, and Francis H. Caskin for respondent Sun Oil Co.; Homer E. McEwen, Jr., for respondent Sunray DX Oil Co.; Richard F. Remmers for respondent Sohio Petroleum Co.; and Kiel Boone for respondent Cox.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Federal Power Commission v. Sunray DX Oil Co., ante, p. 9.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 391 U.S. 366, 367