CALIFORNIA v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO.Annotate this Case
391 U.S. 365 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
CALIFORNIA v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO., 391 U.S. 365 (1968)391 U.S. 365
CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO. ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 373.
Decided May 20, 1968.*
Certiorari granted; 377 F.2d 278, vacated and remanded.
[Footnote *] Together with No. 380, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. et al. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. et al., and No. 385, Federal Power Commission v. Phillips Petroleum Co. et al., also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the same court.
Mary Moran Pajalich and J. Calvin Simpson for petitioners in No. 373. Frederick T. Searls and Malcolm H. Furbush for Pacific Gas & Electric Co., C. Hayden Ames for San Diego Gas & Electric Co., and John Ormasa for Southern California Gas Co. et al., petitioners in No. 380. Solicitor General Marshall and Richard A. Solomon for petitioner in No. 385.
Tom P. Hamill, R. D. Haworth, James L. Armour, William H. Tabb, and Carroll L. Gilliam for respondent Mobil Oil Corp. in all three cases.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgments are vacated. The cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Permian Basin Area Rate Cases, 390 U.S. 747.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.