GOLDBLATT v. CITY OF DALLAS, 391 U.S. 360 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
GOLDBLATT v. CITY OF DALLAS, 391 U.S. 360 (1968) 391 U.S. 360GOLDBLATT v. CITY OF DALLAS.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 1317.
Decided May 20, 1968.
279 F. Supp. 106, appeal dismissed.
Joseph A. Devany for appellant.
N. Alex Bickley, Ted P. MacMaster, and H. P. Kucera for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
391 U.S. 360 (1968) 391 U.S. 360 (1968) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
HOWARD v. OHIO, 391 U.S. 360 (1968) 391 U.S. 360HOWARD v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 1217, Misc.
Decided May 20, 1968.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Neil K. Evans for appellant.
John T. Corrigan for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
GOLDBLATT v. CITY OF DALLAS, 391 U.S. 360 (1968) 391 U.S. 360 GOLDBLATT v. CITY OF DALLAS.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 1317.
Decided May 20, 1968.
279 F. Supp. 106, appeal dismissed. Joseph A. Devany for appellant. N. Alex Bickley, Ted P. MacMaster, and H. P. Kucera for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
391 U.S. 360 (1968) 391 U.S. 360 (1968) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
HOWARD v. OHIO, 391 U.S. 360 (1968) 391 U.S. 360 HOWARD v. OHIO.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 1217, Misc.
Decided May 20, 1968.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Neil K. Evans for appellant. John T. Corrigan for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 391 U.S. 360, 361
