WISEMAN v. BARBY, 390 U.S. 339 (1968)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

WISEMAN v. BARBY, 390 U.S. 339 (1968) 390 U.S. 339

WISEMAN, DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA v. BARBY
ET UX.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 871.
Decided March 11, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 380 F.2d 121, reversed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Harris Weinstein and Grant W. Wiprud for petitioner.

John K. Speck for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc., 356 U.S. 260.


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

WISEMAN v. BARBY, 390 U.S. 339 (1968) 390 U.S. 339 WISEMAN, DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA v. BARBY
ET UX.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 871.
Decided March 11, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 380 F.2d 121, reversed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Harris Weinstein and Grant W. Wiprud for petitioner.

John K. Speck for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc., 356 U.S. 260.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted and the case set down for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

Page 390 U.S. 339, 340